Quote

“The fundamental dogma of Borrow’s religion was the providence of God. So far as I know, he did not formulate his notion of the purpose of the world; he accepted the view of St. Paul, that the creation is moving to some ‘divine event’; and that within the great scheme there are numberless subservient ends which man is being urged by Divine admonition to fulfil. Such admonitions come to men in many ways; we speak of them as modes of inspiration; and even those who question the inspiration of prophets do not refuse the word in speaking of poets and musicians. Borrow did not question prophetic inspiration in the past, because he believed in it as a present fact. He believed that to the man who by prayer kept himself in touch with the Divine Spirit intimations were vouchsafed of the Divine will, which brought clear light into the dark places of life. He somewhat shocked the good but precise secretary of the Bible Society by declaring in a letter from Spain that he had been “very passionate in prayer during the last two or three days,” and in consequence, as he thought, saw his way ‘with considerable clearness’: on another occasion, by saying that he was ‘what the world calls exceedingly superstitious’ because he had changed some plan in consequence of a dream; and again by saying, ‘My usual wonderful good fortune accompanied me.’ …There can be no doubt that Borrow was a firm believer in what our fathers called ‘particular providences,’ ‘leadings of the Divine Spirit.’ He believed, for example, that he was doing the will of God in circulating the Bible, and he also believed that God made his way plain for so doing.”